Sunday, February 27, 2011

2nd Commercial Break

Okay...Here's what I've watched.

An old Kirk Douglas struggle through the Best Supporting Actress and award it to Melissa Leo from The Fighter who took forever for her speech, but yet they cut off the great Aaron Sorkin. WTF!

Toy Story 3 won Best Animated Feature Film which is cool but I was really hoping it went to How to Train Your Dragon because that movie was better in my mind. In other words I cried more during How to Train Your Dragon.

I was really hoping Inception would win Best Original Screenplay cause its Christopher Nolan but The King's Speech got it so Im still happy.

Cinematography

Ohh this is a good one....

Inception!

Hells Yeah!
Okay First Award here we go Tom Hanks...

Art Direction....

Alice in Wonderland!

Yeah Tim Burton!!!

My Predictions

with 15 minutes before the start of the Oscars Im gonna give my predictions for what I think will win. Get ready for the onslaught!

Lead Actor - Colin Firth: The Kings Speech
Supporting Actor - Geoffrey Rush: The King's Speech
Lead Actress - Natalie Portman: Black Swan
Supporting Actress - Hailee Steinfeld: True Grit
Animated Feature Film - How to Train Your Dragon
Art Direction - Inception
Cinematography - Black Swan
Costume Design - Alice in Wonderland
Best Director - Coen Brothers: True Grit
Feature Documentary - Exit Through the Gift Shop
Film Editing - The Social Network
Foreign Language Film - Biutiful
Music (original score) - Inception
Music (original song) - Tangled
Short Film (Animated) - Day & Night: Pixar
Short Film (Live Action) - The Confession
Sound Editing - Inception
Sound Mixing - Inception
Visual Effects - Inception
Writing (Adapted Screenplay) - The Social Network
Writing (Original Screenplay) - Inception

and Finally......

Best Picture - The Social Network

Okay...5 minutes left and those are my picks. Its gonna be a great show, I cant wait.

The Oscars

Ill do my best to try and keep this up to date with what im watching on the Oscars. There might be spoiler alerts for those on the west coast cause I don't know if the Oscars is live. I guess we will find out.
Enjoy the Oscars!

Wednesday, February 23, 2011






Actor in a Leading Role. Now the big question is how do they decipher what a leading role is.A leading role in my mind is someone who has the most face time on screen and in this case it would be which man has the most face time. As mentioned earlier I was looking at the five candidates for Actor in a Leading Role for the 2011 Academy Awards.I will show pictures so you can continue to look at these gentlemen's lovely faces while I spurt on about their performance in my eyes.

Javier Bardem - Biutiful
Javier Bardem plays Uxbal a conflicted man who struggles to reconcile fatherhood, love, spirituality, crime,
guilt and mortality amidst the dangerous underworld of modern Barcelona. I just watched the movie for what it was, so I turned the subtitles off so I didn't have to constantly read what was being said (no espanol here).
Javier Bardem's performance was very gritty and down to earth. He really got into the nature of being a bad guy but wanting to change his ways because he doesn't want the image of himself tarnished by those that love him dearly. You can see it in a scene with his son and daughter at the beginning of the movie (at least I thought it was his son and daughter, remember no subtitles). In the scene, he has just returned from a funeral of a small child, and the funerals in his part of Spain are very secluded, and he gets berated by possibly the grandmother
of the small child for his lack of compassion. He doesn't yell back at the old woman he just walks on by. He returns to his house and cooks a lovely meal for his two kids and is talking about their day.
He sits down with them and the son begins to chomp wildly on his food disturbing Uxbal. Uxbal annoyed slams his fists on the table and sends his son to his room. Then there is bitter silence for the next few minutes while his daughter looks at him scared and amazed. I could see the guilt that ran through him from the previous encounter and how he handled his son were some of the struggles that he was about to go into.
Javier Bardem is an amazing actor, he lives and breathes a role to its fullest extent. I think this role though gave him extra credibility with showing a variety of emotions on camera. There are not many actors that can pull that off very well but excellent job Mr. Bardem.

Jeff Bridges - True Grit


I just have to say Jeff Bridges is my favorite actor of all time. I haven't seen him play a bad role yet. Coming off his excellent win last year for Crazy Heart (also, a very good movie) he is back as Rooster Cogburn in True Grit. This is a remake done by the Coen Brothers (also my favorite directors). For those of you who don't know about True Grit here is the synopsis. A tough U.S. Marshal helps a stubborn young woman track down her father's murderer. Short and simple. The great John Wayne was the original Cogburn, and he set a pretty high
standard for Bridges to reach.
Bridges in fact took that standard and made it better in my eyes. He gave the character more depth, or backstory that I didn't see in the John Wayne version. I believed that Cogburn was a lazy, drunk U.S. Marshall that wanted to do what he wanted to do.
He was paid to kill the man that killed the girl's father, he didn't want tagging along and it showed, but as he realized the seriousness, or stubbornness of the girl he felt accustomed to her face. She grew on him and he started seeing a lot of errors that he did in the past and in the present.
I hope and pray that Jeff Bridges wins the Best Actor award every year he is nominated except this year. I think this was a "safe" role. He performed the shit out of it but the part has already been done. He also kind of had that Crazy Heart role in this role and I don't think the Academy will notice that the two are different.

Jesse Eisenberg - Social Network
The Social Network was an amazingly made film. One of the best of the years. Jesse Eisenberg's performance...ehhh. You might be saying, "What?!?, it was the best that I've seen portraying someone." and I say "I've seen better." The Social Network is about Facebook. Everyone uses Facebook, or they will eventually. There are three different stories intermixed into one. Eisenberg plays Mark Zuckerburg, the founder of Facebook.
You see, Eisenberg played the role exceptionally well. His best yet, but his previous films aren't all that great. Adventureland? Zombieland? Ok, Zombieland was an amazing movie granted, but Eisenberg didn't play a stand out part and he was the lead actor in it! They should have named this movie The Social Networkland and then he could have kept the theme going. I don't really like Jesse Eisenberg if you couldn't tell where I was going with that last rant. I think he was just written an excellent part and he performed it like any paid actor would do. The movie is better than the actor.

Colin Firth - The King's Speech
Colin Firth played the hell out of this part! I think he really wants an Oscar. I couldnt tell though. The King's Speech is about how Bertie (Colin Firth) battles his speech impediment to make one of the most historically famous speeches of Great Britain as King George VI.
Colin Firth is a well accomplished British actor. I've seen him in a lot of British TV shows and older British movies. He is well traversed in the period film. This period film also gave a challenge to him. He not only had to act as a Duke, he had to talk with a stammer and not fumble around to much. There is a part where his daughters ask him to read a bedtime story to them, and you just feel so heartbroken for him while he fumbles through line after line looking to his wife for guidance every once in awhile. I have never seen an actor stammer and still keep the composure to continue to stammer while performing on screen. Yet to this day. He brought the part of King George VI to life to me. I've heard about him but Colin Firth's performance really brought what Bertie went through on a day-to-day basis. Truly Remarkable.

James Franco - 127 Hours
James Franco did an about face with his career with this movie. It's now heading in a good direction. I guess I never saw the potential until now. 127 hours is the story of Aron Ralston and how he made it five days with his hand stuck between a rock and wall of a cavern. The story shows what he went through during those 127 hours. I just finished this movie and I am blown away still. What Aron Ralston went through is escrutiating. I would died in that situation.
James Franco, played this part to the T. I've read Between a Rock and a Hard Place and it gets pretty vivid on what Aron Ralston went through. It's a change from James Franco's last endeavor Date Night, or rather Pineapple Express, or even better Spiderman. I respect James Franco now. It is hard for anyone to be on camera and the only thing on camera and to act the shit out of it. I don't like watching things when its focused on one person for more than 5 minutes but this, I could watch another 120 minutes of James Franco giving a monologue. Its sad but thats how much he kicked ass.

So there are my thoughts on the Actor in a Leading Role candidates. My prediction is now a toss up between James Franco and Colin Firth. If you would have asked me a week ago I would have definitely told you Colin Firth but after seeing James Franco marvel in 127 hours (I think I just made a funny with James Franco, if you catch it, let me know) I believe James Franco has a chance. I don't think Jesse Eisenberg should be in this bunch, maybe they should have put Mark Wahlberg from The Fighter in here instead. Jeff Bridges played a "safe" role, and I just couldnt understand Javier Bardem.

Until We Meet Again

"You'll Never Walk Again..." -Milt Anderson

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Bad Girls and Plastic Princesses(part I)

I have long felt that in the wasteland that is the current state of American popular culture, the demographic that gets it the worst is little girls. Early teen girlsare constantly bombarded with not just wrong messages, but with Mixed messages, which can be even worse. These messages are unavoidable for little girls, beamed directly into their heads via music, television, commercials, and their peers. Mixed messages about what is expected of them as they head into their teen years, what their values should be, what should be respected, how to be considered respectable. These girls grow up and become a part of the problem, passing along these mixed messages to their younger sisters and eventually their daughters.

There are many perpetrators of these messages. Currently the one that irks me the most is porn star Kim Kardashian. I'm going to call her that whenever I make reference to her. I refuse to buy into the illusion that she is noteworthy for any other reason. She is on television, she is in magazines, she has fans because she videoed herself having sex with a dude, saw it released, and made a bunch of money off of it. Now she's famous because of it. Reports put her family's 2010 earnings at $65 million, between branding(putting their name on random crap like perfume), tv shows, public appearances and twitter advertising. That's right, companies pay Porn Star Kim Kardashian to talk about their products on her twitter feed. According to the Huffington post, she has 6 million twitter followers. Many of these followers are little girls like the ones I made reference to earlier. So what are they learning from the Kardashian family?

So porn star Kim Kardashian gets famous for having sex with a b-list r&b singer. She parlays that into a playboy spread. Lord knows how but, she parlays THAT into a show for not just her, but her entire family, and now there are actually several shows featuring these people. Shows that are basically her and her equally vapid, shallow and pointless family whining about various and sundry false dramas. After thorougly denouncing her pornstar history, she appeared completely naked in V magazine.

Several months ago, the Kardashians lent their name to a pre-paid credit card. The "Kardashian card" was marketed to young people "so they could learn about how to manage their money". Eventually it was revealed that the card saddled users with some decidedly predatory financial burdens including:

- A $99 up front annual fee for using the card

-monthly fee of $7.95 that kicks in after the initial purchase period.

-A $9.95 replacement fee for a lost card

-a $25 express fee to rush a card to you if there's an emergency.

there's more, but I'll spare you. The point is, they were marketing this to KIDS! The Kardashians ended up disassociating themselves with the card, releasing a statement that said in part: “The Kardashians have worked extremely long and hard to create a positive public persona that appeals to everyone, particularly young adults. Unfortunately, the negative spotlight turned on the Kardashians as a result of the Attorney General’s comments and actions threatens everything for which they have worked.”

Some of the hijinks engaged in on this show have included the two youngest Kardashian sisters(9 and 11 at the time) trying their skills on a stripper pole. There was an episode detailing Kim's (supposed) conflict about whether or not to pose for playboy, and an episode in which Kardashian brother Robert experiences a bout of priaprism after he drinks a beverage meant for his stepfather, Bruce Jenner. The Drink had been spiked by the family's matriarch, Kris Jenner, who oversees this tawdry den of materialism and questionable values. So let me get this straight: This is the work they've done to cultivate a positive public persona of themselves for young people? Somebody get me a striped shirt and a yellow flag to throw, because I'm calling bullshit.
Notice the wording. The statement basically says they removed themselves from this card NOT because the card was bad, but because it was bad for their image. I believe that it's only because the predatory nature of the Kardashian card was found out and publicized that they moved away from it. I don't believe for a moment they cared about the possiblity of some consumer getting hosed, because I can't believe that they didn't know about this going in. Quiet as it's kept, these chicks are business owners. That's the one non hate-able thing about them. they've got a relatively successful chain of boutiques. "Business owner" translates into "knows how to read small print". They knew everything about that card before they signed on and they signed on anyway, until it became an inconvenience to their q rating. Translation: They don't care about you. They don't care about your kids. They do care about your money. they care about helping to convince you that being like them means being happy, because the more people who believe that, the richer they get.
It would seem to me that the over arching message of the Kardashian "Phenomenon" is that the best way to have a life worth living is to be born rich, spend your father's hard earned money, whore yourself out at any opportunity to anyone. And in doing so, they help to corrupt our kids.